https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366931 The court allowed the criminal original petition and quashed the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.49 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Dindigul. The court emphasized that the accused were not partners at the relevant time, the complaint was not maintainable due to improper delegation of authority, and the non-impleading of the partnership firm was a significant procedural lapse. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition was also closed. en-us Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:19:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366931 The court allowed the criminal original petition and quashed the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.49 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Dindigul. The court emphasized that the accused were not partners at the relevant time, the complaint was not maintainable due to improper delegation of authority, and the non-impleading of the partnership firm was a significant procedural lapse. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition was also closed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366931