<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 659 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366923</link>
    <description>Commission paid to Amway India distributors was not taxable in full because the Tribunal distinguished between commission attributable to a distributor&#039;s own purchase volume and commission linked to the performance of the sponsored sales group. The former was treated as outside business auxiliary service, while the latter could attract service tax as sales promotion service. As the adjudicating order applied tax to the gross commission without separating taxable from non-taxable components, it was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh quantification and adjudication in line with the earlier Tribunal ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:18:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 659 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366923</link>
      <description>Commission paid to Amway India distributors was not taxable in full because the Tribunal distinguished between commission attributable to a distributor&#039;s own purchase volume and commission linked to the performance of the sponsored sales group. The former was treated as outside business auxiliary service, while the latter could attract service tax as sales promotion service. As the adjudicating order applied tax to the gross commission without separating taxable from non-taxable components, it was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh quantification and adjudication in line with the earlier Tribunal ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>