https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366921 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the liability to pay service tax on commission received from banks and financial institutions under Business Auxiliary Service. The demand for the period 01.07.2003 to 31.03.2006 was set aside due to the extended period of limitation and conflicting decisions, leading to the annulment of penalties imposed. The Tribunal upheld the payment made by the appellant under Business Support Service for a different period, not delving into the merits of the case for that timeframe. Penalties were also set aside based on the lack of clarity and conflicting decisions. en-us Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:18:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366921 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the liability to pay service tax on commission received from banks and financial institutions under Business Auxiliary Service. The demand for the period 01.07.2003 to 31.03.2006 was set aside due to the extended period of limitation and conflicting decisions, leading to the annulment of penalties imposed. The Tribunal upheld the payment made by the appellant under Business Support Service for a different period, not delving into the merits of the case for that timeframe. Penalties were also set aside based on the lack of clarity and conflicting decisions. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366921