https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366919 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI involved the issue of condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeal, due to the appellant's prolonged inaction of one and a half years without sufficient justification. Despite the appellant's reliance on their counsel's negligence, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of adherence to limitation rules to prevent dilatory tactics, noting the lack of communication and explanation for the delay from the appellant's end. en-us Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:18:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366919 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI involved the issue of condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeal, due to the appellant's prolonged inaction of one and a half years without sufficient justification. Despite the appellant's reliance on their counsel's negligence, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of adherence to limitation rules to prevent dilatory tactics, noting the lack of communication and explanation for the delay from the appellant's end. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366919