<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 119 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14412</link>
    <description>Gross interest expenditure incurred in foreign branches was held to qualify for weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Madras High Court applied its earlier decision in the assessee-bank&#039;s own case, where the same claim had been accepted, and followed that reasoning to allow the deduction. The claim was therefore upheld in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:43:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 119 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14412</link>
      <description>Gross interest expenditure incurred in foreign branches was held to qualify for weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Madras High Court applied its earlier decision in the assessee-bank&#039;s own case, where the same claim had been accepted, and followed that reasoning to allow the deduction. The claim was therefore upheld in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>