<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 649 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366913</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for Service Tax under Business Auxiliary Service, as it differed from the proposal in the Show Cause Notice, deeming it unsustainable under settled law. The Tribunal did not address the taxability of incentives from print media but focused on the discrepancy between proposed and confirmed heads of taxation, ultimately allowing the appeal and overturning the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:18:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 649 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366913</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for Service Tax under Business Auxiliary Service, as it differed from the proposal in the Show Cause Notice, deeming it unsustainable under settled law. The Tribunal did not address the taxability of incentives from print media but focused on the discrepancy between proposed and confirmed heads of taxation, ultimately allowing the appeal and overturning the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>