<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 646 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366910</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellant, a deemed service provider for GTA service, in a case concerning exemption under notification No. 32/2004-ST. The Tribunal found that the declaration submitted by the transporter to the appellant met the necessary conditions for exemption, as clarified in a relevant board&#039;s letter. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to the exemption, overturning the order confirming a demand for differential Service Tax. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:18:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 646 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366910</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellant, a deemed service provider for GTA service, in a case concerning exemption under notification No. 32/2004-ST. The Tribunal found that the declaration submitted by the transporter to the appellant met the necessary conditions for exemption, as clarified in a relevant board&#039;s letter. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to the exemption, overturning the order confirming a demand for differential Service Tax. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>