<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 644 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366908</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the provisional nature of the assessments and the corresponding lack of grounds for penalties or confiscation. The issues raised by the Revenue were not deemed substantial questions of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:17:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 644 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366908</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the provisional nature of the assessments and the corresponding lack of grounds for penalties or confiscation. The issues raised by the Revenue were not deemed substantial questions of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>