https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366905 The appellants accepted the demands in issues I, II, III, and V without contesting on merits. The demand in issue IV was set aside as Rule 8 does not apply to job work activities. Issue VI was upheld for the normal period, but penalties were set aside. The Tribunal found no evidence of intent to evade duty, setting aside demands for the extended period and associated penalties. The matter was remanded for re-quantification. The appeal was partly allowed with adjustments made to the demands and penalties. en-us Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:17:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366905 The appellants accepted the demands in issues I, II, III, and V without contesting on merits. The demand in issue IV was set aside as Rule 8 does not apply to job work activities. Issue VI was upheld for the normal period, but penalties were set aside. The Tribunal found no evidence of intent to evade duty, setting aside demands for the extended period and associated penalties. The matter was remanded for re-quantification. The appeal was partly allowed with adjustments made to the demands and penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366905