https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366901 The tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming the demand on finish goods lost in a fire incident, deeming it premature due to the pending remission claim of duty on the affected goods. The matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority with directions to first decide on the remission duty claim before addressing the show cause notice. The decision emphasized the importance of proper sequencing in adjudication to ensure a comprehensive consideration of all relevant aspects. en-us Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:17:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366901 The tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming the demand on finish goods lost in a fire incident, deeming it premature due to the pending remission claim of duty on the affected goods. The matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority with directions to first decide on the remission duty claim before addressing the show cause notice. The decision emphasized the importance of proper sequencing in adjudication to ensure a comprehensive consideration of all relevant aspects. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366901