<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 633 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366897</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on railway track materials and works contract services used for laying railway lines within and around factory premises was held admissible. The railway siding and track were treated as an integral part of the factory&#039;s material-handling system because they facilitated inward movement of inputs and outward movement of finished goods. The track outside the factory was regarded as an extension of the internal track, satisfying the requirement that the goods be used in the factory. Railway track was treated as capital goods in this context, and the related works contract services were not covered by the exclusion in Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 633 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366897</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on railway track materials and works contract services used for laying railway lines within and around factory premises was held admissible. The railway siding and track were treated as an integral part of the factory&#039;s material-handling system because they facilitated inward movement of inputs and outward movement of finished goods. The track outside the factory was regarded as an extension of the internal track, satisfying the requirement that the goods be used in the factory. Railway track was treated as capital goods in this context, and the related works contract services were not covered by the exclusion in Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>