<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 628 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366892</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeals and remanded the matter back to the Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax for a fresh order on merits, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of all documentary evidence and clarifications from the appellant. The Joint Commissioner was directed to complete this exercise within two months. The High Court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and that all contentions were kept open for consideration. The High Court also noted that the appellant would restrict its submissions to specific questions and that the Joint Commissioner should re-examine the deductibility of 1% expenses, including bank charges and interest, afresh and uninfluenced by previous conclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 628 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366892</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeals and remanded the matter back to the Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax for a fresh order on merits, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of all documentary evidence and clarifications from the appellant. The Joint Commissioner was directed to complete this exercise within two months. The High Court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and that all contentions were kept open for consideration. The High Court also noted that the appellant would restrict its submissions to specific questions and that the Joint Commissioner should re-examine the deductibility of 1% expenses, including bank charges and interest, afresh and uninfluenced by previous conclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366892</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>