<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1366 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274979</link>
    <description>The court remanded the matter back to the Settlement Commission to reconsider the operational status of the machine, emphasizing the importance of determining duty liability based on machine operation. The interim payment made by the petitioner was to remain with the authority pending the final decision. The court directed the Settlement Commission to thoroughly assess all evidence and submissions in issuing a reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 19:44:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1366 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274979</link>
      <description>The court remanded the matter back to the Settlement Commission to reconsider the operational status of the machine, emphasizing the importance of determining duty liability based on machine operation. The interim payment made by the petitioner was to remain with the authority pending the final decision. The court directed the Settlement Commission to thoroughly assess all evidence and submissions in issuing a reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>