<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 364 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274969</link>
    <description>The court addressed issues of jurisdiction based on the cause of action, interpretation of Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, and the balance of convenience in determining the forum for the suit. It clarified that a litigant can file a suit in the High Court if the cause of action arises wholly within its jurisdiction. The court emphasized the importance of considering all relevant facts to determine jurisdiction and highlighted the principle of balance of convenience in deciding the forum for the suit. The court set aside the previous order and remitted the case for re-hearing to determine whether leave should be granted, stressing the need for proper adjudication based on all relevant facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:26:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 364 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274969</link>
      <description>The court addressed issues of jurisdiction based on the cause of action, interpretation of Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, and the balance of convenience in determining the forum for the suit. It clarified that a litigant can file a suit in the High Court if the cause of action arises wholly within its jurisdiction. The court emphasized the importance of considering all relevant facts to determine jurisdiction and highlighted the principle of balance of convenience in deciding the forum for the suit. The court set aside the previous order and remitted the case for re-hearing to determine whether leave should be granted, stressing the need for proper adjudication based on all relevant facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>