<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 82 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14406</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order, and directed the Commissioner to reconsider the application under section 273A based on the observations made in the judgment. The petitioner was granted a hearing opportunity, and no costs were awarded. If any security amount was deposited by the petitioner, it was ordered to be refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:27:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 82 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14406</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, set aside the impugned order, and directed the Commissioner to reconsider the application under section 273A based on the observations made in the judgment. The petitioner was granted a hearing opportunity, and no costs were awarded. If any security amount was deposited by the petitioner, it was ordered to be refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>