https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274966 The appeals were allowed, permitting the suit to proceed for all causes of action, including infringement of copyright, trade mark, and passing off. The court found the plaintiff's suit maintainable in the Madras High Court, emphasizing the avoidance of multiple suits. The defendant's undertaking not to use the impugned label was accepted, and no interim injunction was granted. Costs for the appeals were not imposed. en-us Wed, 25 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Sep 2018 16:24:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274966 The appeals were allowed, permitting the suit to proceed for all causes of action, including infringement of copyright, trade mark, and passing off. The court found the plaintiff's suit maintainable in the Madras High Court, emphasizing the avoidance of multiple suits. The defendant's undertaking not to use the impugned label was accepted, and no interim injunction was granted. Costs for the appeals were not imposed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274966