<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (11) TMI 161 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274965</link>
    <description>The court upheld the trial judge&#039;s decision to refuse the revocation of leave granted under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the validity of the leave granted to sue the proposed fourth defendant and concluding that the balance of convenience favored allowing the suit to proceed in the chosen forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 16:09:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (11) TMI 161 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274965</link>
      <description>The court upheld the trial judge&#039;s decision to refuse the revocation of leave granted under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the validity of the leave granted to sue the proposed fourth defendant and concluding that the balance of convenience favored allowing the suit to proceed in the chosen forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>