<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1188 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the addition of Membership Fees for a Partnership firm, stating it was a revenue expenditure necessary for business operations. The Tribunal emphasized that the fee did not result in an enduring benefit but was essential for conducting business effectively. Consequently, the issues related to depreciation disallowance, which were upheld by the Ld CIT(A), became irrelevant following the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:52:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1188 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the addition of Membership Fees for a Partnership firm, stating it was a revenue expenditure necessary for business operations. The Tribunal emphasized that the fee did not result in an enduring benefit but was essential for conducting business effectively. Consequently, the issues related to depreciation disallowance, which were upheld by the Ld CIT(A), became irrelevant following the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>