<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1922 (10) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274963</link>
    <description>Pleaded fraud and concealment may form part of the cause of action for leave to sue under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent if the allegations, read as a whole, disclose an within jurisdiction. Even so, leave remains discretionary and may be refused where the suit is essentially connected with another forum and the balance of convenience favours that forum. Section 20 of the Civil Procedure Code does not enlarge the High Court&#039;s original jurisdiction, and the mere presence of some defendants within jurisdiction does not by itself justify entertaining the whole suit. The result was that leave to sue was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 1922 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 15:43:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1922 (10) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274963</link>
      <description>Pleaded fraud and concealment may form part of the cause of action for leave to sue under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent if the allegations, read as a whole, disclose an within jurisdiction. Even so, leave remains discretionary and may be refused where the suit is essentially connected with another forum and the balance of convenience favours that forum. Section 20 of the Civil Procedure Code does not enlarge the High Court&#039;s original jurisdiction, and the mere presence of some defendants within jurisdiction does not by itself justify entertaining the whole suit. The result was that leave to sue was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 1922 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>