https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274961 The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the HC's decision that dismissed the suit as time-barred under Article 58 of the Limitation Act. The SC emphasized that the question of limitation involves mixed questions of fact and law, requiring proper pleadings and evidence. It ruled that the plaint should not be rejected solely on limitation grounds without examining the facts. The SC clarified that Article 65, with a 12-year limitation period, applies to recovery of possession suits based on title. The case was remanded for trial, and costs of Rs. 25,000 were awarded to the appellant. en-us Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jan 2024 12:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274961 The SC allowed the appeal, overturning the HC's decision that dismissed the suit as time-barred under Article 58 of the Limitation Act. The SC emphasized that the question of limitation involves mixed questions of fact and law, requiring proper pleadings and evidence. It ruled that the plaint should not be rejected solely on limitation grounds without examining the facts. The SC clarified that Article 65, with a 12-year limitation period, applies to recovery of possession suits based on title. The case was remanded for trial, and costs of Rs. 25,000 were awarded to the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274961