<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1488 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274960</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the amendment to Clause 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regulations, dismissing the appeals and rejecting the conflict of interest claim. It found the Appellant had locus standi to file the suits, deemed them maintainable, but denied the interim relief sought. The court determined that the amendment was properly passed and did not result in financial loss to BCCI due to the alleged conflict of interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:49:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1488 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274960</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the amendment to Clause 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regulations, dismissing the appeals and rejecting the conflict of interest claim. It found the Appellant had locus standi to file the suits, deemed them maintainable, but denied the interim relief sought. The court determined that the amendment was properly passed and did not result in financial loss to BCCI due to the alleged conflict of interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>