<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 614 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366878</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It was determined that the revised return, filed within the prescribed period and including the surrendered amount, did not warrant a penalty as there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, affirming that the revised return filed by the assessee was valid and did not attract the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:44:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 614 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366878</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the deletion of the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. It was determined that the revised return, filed within the prescribed period and including the surrendered amount, did not warrant a penalty as there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, affirming that the revised return filed by the assessee was valid and did not attract the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>