<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Section 47 of CGST Act 2017; Dismisses Petition on Late Fees as Penalty Claim.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41370</link>
    <description>Constitutional validity of section 47 of the CGST Act, 2017 - Levy of late-fees - principal contentions of the petitioners are that the Government is trying to recover penalty in the guise of late fee charges - Petition dismissed since the, the petitioners who are themselves active tax consultants and tax practitioners, not the person who suffered the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:43:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 22:58:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Section 47 of CGST Act 2017; Dismisses Petition on Late Fees as Penalty Claim.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41370</link>
      <description>Constitutional validity of section 47 of the CGST Act, 2017 - Levy of late-fees - principal contentions of the petitioners are that the Government is trying to recover penalty in the guise of late fee charges - Petition dismissed since the, the petitioners who are themselves active tax consultants and tax practitioners, not the person who suffered the penalty.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:43:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>