<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 598 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366862</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee based on the lack of proper satisfaction by the Assessing Officer as required by law and relevant judgments. Emphasizing the importance of recording satisfaction before disallowing under section 14A, the Tribunal referenced legal precedents. Considering the surplus funds compared to investments, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeals in light of presented facts, circumstances, and legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:43:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 598 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366862</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee based on the lack of proper satisfaction by the Assessing Officer as required by law and relevant judgments. Emphasizing the importance of recording satisfaction before disallowing under section 14A, the Tribunal referenced legal precedents. Considering the surplus funds compared to investments, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeals in light of presented facts, circumstances, and legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>