<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 596 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366860</link>
    <description>The Calcutta High Court admitted a winding-up application against a company under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, due to its inability to pay debts amounting to Rs. 1,74,65,867. The court rejected the company&#039;s defense of lack of knowledge regarding an account confirmation statement and its failure to respond to a statutory notice, leading to a presumption of admission of the debt. The company was directed to pay the outstanding amount in installments, emphasizing its failure to provide a genuine defense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:43:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 596 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366860</link>
      <description>The Calcutta High Court admitted a winding-up application against a company under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, due to its inability to pay debts amounting to Rs. 1,74,65,867. The court rejected the company&#039;s defense of lack of knowledge regarding an account confirmation statement and its failure to respond to a statutory notice, leading to a presumption of admission of the debt. The company was directed to pay the outstanding amount in installments, emphasizing its failure to provide a genuine defense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>