<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 595 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366859</link>
    <description>The amended transfer provision gives the High Court discretion to transfer pending winding up proceedings, but that discretion must be exercised judicially. Where the winding up petition had already been contested, affidavits exchanged, and the hearing had substantially progressed, and the related insolvency application before the NCLT had not even been listed or admitted, there was no basis to displace the pending proceeding. The request for transfer was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:43:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 595 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366859</link>
      <description>The amended transfer provision gives the High Court discretion to transfer pending winding up proceedings, but that discretion must be exercised judicially. Where the winding up petition had already been contested, affidavits exchanged, and the hearing had substantially progressed, and the related insolvency application before the NCLT had not even been listed or admitted, there was no basis to displace the pending proceeding. The request for transfer was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>