<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 593 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366857</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the orders confirming the demand and penalty, remitting the matter back to the original authority for fresh consideration based on newly available material evidence. The Court emphasized substantial justice over technicalities, directing the authority to reconsider the case in light of the petitioner&#039;s submissions. The writ petition was disposed of, highlighting the importance of considering all relevant materials for a just adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=534003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 593 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366857</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the orders confirming the demand and penalty, remitting the matter back to the original authority for fresh consideration based on newly available material evidence. The Court emphasized substantial justice over technicalities, directing the authority to reconsider the case in light of the petitioner&#039;s submissions. The writ petition was disposed of, highlighting the importance of considering all relevant materials for a just adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>