<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 77 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14400</link>
    <description>A reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act was upheld where reasons had been recorded on file and sanction was obtained from the Deputy Commissioner. The Court treated the existence of recorded reasons showing belief that income had escaped assessment as sufficient, and held that prior communication of those reasons to the assessee was not required before issuance of notice. Challenges alleging absence of reasons, irrelevance of the recorded reasons, non-application of mind, and legal malice were not supported on the material before the Court, so the notice was not liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:13:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 77 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14400</link>
      <description>A reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act was upheld where reasons had been recorded on file and sanction was obtained from the Deputy Commissioner. The Court treated the existence of recorded reasons showing belief that income had escaped assessment as sufficient, and held that prior communication of those reasons to the assessee was not required before issuance of notice. Challenges alleging absence of reasons, irrelevance of the recorded reasons, non-application of mind, and legal malice were not supported on the material before the Court, so the notice was not liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>