<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 586 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366850</link>
    <description>Pre-execution preventive detention under COFEPOSA was quashed because the proposed detenu had appeared before the customs adjudicating authority, complied with bail conditions, and there was no material showing evasion of law. The court held that interference at the pre-execution stage is justified where the order has no practical or preventive utility. It further found that the detention grounds were identical to those of co-detenues whose orders had not been confirmed by the Advisory Board, and no separate material existed against the petitioner. The order was therefore rendered purposeless and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:42:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 586 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366850</link>
      <description>Pre-execution preventive detention under COFEPOSA was quashed because the proposed detenu had appeared before the customs adjudicating authority, complied with bail conditions, and there was no material showing evasion of law. The court held that interference at the pre-execution stage is justified where the order has no practical or preventive utility. It further found that the detention grounds were identical to those of co-detenues whose orders had not been confirmed by the Advisory Board, and no separate material existed against the petitioner. The order was therefore rendered purposeless and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>