<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 572 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366836</link>
    <description>The court emphasized the importance of exhausting statutory appeal remedies before resorting to writ petitions. It directed the petitioner to file an appeal within four weeks and instructed the appellate authority to consider the appeal on its merits. The respondents were prohibited from taking any coercive action against the petitioner until the appeal was heard. The writ petition was disposed of without any costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:41:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 572 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366836</link>
      <description>The court emphasized the importance of exhausting statutory appeal remedies before resorting to writ petitions. It directed the petitioner to file an appeal within four weeks and instructed the appellate authority to consider the appeal on its merits. The respondents were prohibited from taking any coercive action against the petitioner until the appeal was heard. The writ petition was disposed of without any costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>