<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 566 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366830</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and allowing the appeals with costs. The judgment emphasized interpreting notifications liberally to promote industrial growth and highlighted that procedural lapses should not hinder substantive benefits available to the assessee. The court&#039;s decision was based on established legal principles and previous precedents supporting the appellant&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 566 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366830</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and allowing the appeals with costs. The judgment emphasized interpreting notifications liberally to promote industrial growth and highlighted that procedural lapses should not hinder substantive benefits available to the assessee. The court&#039;s decision was based on established legal principles and previous precedents supporting the appellant&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>