<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 565 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366829</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of Cenvat credit on service tax for outwards transportation, citing a Supreme Court decision. It found the extension of the limitation period unjustified, as previous Tribunal decisions allowed such credit and the demand was time-barred. The imposition of a penalty was deemed unwarranted due to the absence of mala fide intentions by the assessee. As a result, the penalty was set aside, and the Tribunal ruled that only the amount falling within the limitation period was payable by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:41:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 565 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366829</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of Cenvat credit on service tax for outwards transportation, citing a Supreme Court decision. It found the extension of the limitation period unjustified, as previous Tribunal decisions allowed such credit and the demand was time-barred. The imposition of a penalty was deemed unwarranted due to the absence of mala fide intentions by the assessee. As a result, the penalty was set aside, and the Tribunal ruled that only the amount falling within the limitation period was payable by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>