<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 563 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366827</link>
    <description>The tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s refund claims for service tax paid on a reverse charge basis, citing the one-year limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument based on a Bombay High Court decision, the tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory time limits for Revenue Authorities, ultimately ruling the claims as barred by limitation and rejecting the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:41:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 563 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366827</link>
      <description>The tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s refund claims for service tax paid on a reverse charge basis, citing the one-year limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument based on a Bombay High Court decision, the tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory time limits for Revenue Authorities, ultimately ruling the claims as barred by limitation and rejecting the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>