<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 557 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366821</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was liable to pay excise duty as the value of job work goods exceeded the threshold limit of 1 crore, making them ineligible for job work exemption notification. The penalty under section 11AC was reduced to 25% if paid within one month. The penalty on the director was upheld due to involvement in the company&#039;s affairs and non-payment of duty. The appeal of the company was partly allowed, while the director&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:41:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 557 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366821</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was liable to pay excise duty as the value of job work goods exceeded the threshold limit of 1 crore, making them ineligible for job work exemption notification. The penalty under section 11AC was reduced to 25% if paid within one month. The penalty on the director was upheld due to involvement in the company&#039;s affairs and non-payment of duty. The appeal of the company was partly allowed, while the director&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>