<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 556 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366820</link>
    <description>The appellant appealed against the denial of Cenvat credit on inputs due to discounts received. The Tribunal found that there was no evidence the discounts were on the duty part, allowing the appellant to claim the credit. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on a circular was dismissed, emphasizing the need to verify refund claims with suppliers. The impugned order was set aside, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:41:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 556 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366820</link>
      <description>The appellant appealed against the denial of Cenvat credit on inputs due to discounts received. The Tribunal found that there was no evidence the discounts were on the duty part, allowing the appellant to claim the credit. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on a circular was dismissed, emphasizing the need to verify refund claims with suppliers. The impugned order was set aside, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>