<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1471 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274944</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in favor of the Assessee on multiple issues. It allowed the commission amount disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) based on ITAT cases and CBDT Circular. Depreciation on computer accessories was allowed at 60% as part of computer machinery. Disallowance of employees&#039; ESI contributions was rejected due to timely payments. Prior period expenses disallowance was overturned based on expense nature. The disallowance related to Employees&#039; Group Gratuity Scheme was partially allowed for reexamination. The Tribunal consistently supported the Assessee, citing legal precedents and factual analysis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 22:15:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1471 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274944</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in favor of the Assessee on multiple issues. It allowed the commission amount disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) based on ITAT cases and CBDT Circular. Depreciation on computer accessories was allowed at 60% as part of computer machinery. Disallowance of employees&#039; ESI contributions was rejected due to timely payments. Prior period expenses disallowance was overturned based on expense nature. The disallowance related to Employees&#039; Group Gratuity Scheme was partially allowed for reexamination. The Tribunal consistently supported the Assessee, citing legal precedents and factual analysis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>