<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1386 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274948</link>
    <description>The court upheld the levy of interest but deleted the penalty imposed under Sections 11A(1), 11AB, and 11AC of the Act. The appellant&#039;s argument that penalty under Section 11AC was unwarranted as duty was remitted before the demand was considered valid, citing the proviso to Section 11AC. The court emphasized the need to fulfill conditions for the proviso&#039;s application, including payment of duty and interest as per Section 11AB. Since the uncertainty of interest liability was highlighted, the court concluded that the proviso&#039;s benefit should not be denied for penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 22:15:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1386 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274948</link>
      <description>The court upheld the levy of interest but deleted the penalty imposed under Sections 11A(1), 11AB, and 11AC of the Act. The appellant&#039;s argument that penalty under Section 11AC was unwarranted as duty was remitted before the demand was considered valid, citing the proviso to Section 11AC. The court emphasized the need to fulfill conditions for the proviso&#039;s application, including payment of duty and interest as per Section 11AB. Since the uncertainty of interest liability was highlighted, the court concluded that the proviso&#039;s benefit should not be denied for penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>