<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1397 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274949</link>
    <description>The case focused on interpreting Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 regarding amending a shipping bill based on the &quot;date of shipment.&quot; It involved discrepancies in the declaration of export quantity of Indian cane molasses. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) allowed partial amendment after verifying the actual quantity shipped. The CESTAT upheld this decision, considering the challenges in verifying molasses quantity at the &quot;let export&quot; order date. The Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence-based decisions, criticized the lack of substantial proof, and highlighted the officer&#039;s discretion in amending bills. The judgment stressed considering goods&#039; unique characteristics and storage aspects, ultimately dismissing the departmental appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 22:15:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1397 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274949</link>
      <description>The case focused on interpreting Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 regarding amending a shipping bill based on the &quot;date of shipment.&quot; It involved discrepancies in the declaration of export quantity of Indian cane molasses. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) allowed partial amendment after verifying the actual quantity shipped. The CESTAT upheld this decision, considering the challenges in verifying molasses quantity at the &quot;let export&quot; order date. The Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence-based decisions, criticized the lack of substantial proof, and highlighted the officer&#039;s discretion in amending bills. The judgment stressed considering goods&#039; unique characteristics and storage aspects, ultimately dismissing the departmental appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>