<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1464 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274950</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, as the issue regarding the retrospective effect of an amendment to the Cenvat Credit Rules on duty payable for clearances to SEZ developers fell under the purview of the Supreme Court as per the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 22:15:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1464 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274950</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, as the issue regarding the retrospective effect of an amendment to the Cenvat Credit Rules on duty payable for clearances to SEZ developers fell under the purview of the Supreme Court as per the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>