<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 558 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274939</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, comprising Ms. Archana Wadhwa and Shri K.K. Agarwal, disposed of the appeal by waiving the pre-deposit of duty demanded by the lower authority. The appellant, a U.S.-based entity providing technical know-how for toothpaste manufacturing, contested the service tax demand. The Tribunal agreed that the transfer of technology and royalty payments were not subject to service tax, citing relevant precedents. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the order demanding service tax and penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 18:46:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 558 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274939</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, comprising Ms. Archana Wadhwa and Shri K.K. Agarwal, disposed of the appeal by waiving the pre-deposit of duty demanded by the lower authority. The appellant, a U.S.-based entity providing technical know-how for toothpaste manufacturing, contested the service tax demand. The Tribunal agreed that the transfer of technology and royalty payments were not subject to service tax, citing relevant precedents. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the order demanding service tax and penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>