https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366802 The Court set aside the first respondent's order granting stay of 80% of the demand with a condition to pay 20% immediately, as it failed to consider the Court's earlier directive and lacked a prima facie view. The matter was remitted back to the first respondent for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for proper consideration within a specified timeframe and directing no coercive steps against the petitioner until a new order is passed. The writ petition was allowed, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Sep 2018 22:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366802 The Court set aside the first respondent's order granting stay of 80% of the demand with a condition to pay 20% immediately, as it failed to consider the Court's earlier directive and lacked a prima facie view. The matter was remitted back to the first respondent for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for proper consideration within a specified timeframe and directing no coercive steps against the petitioner until a new order is passed. The writ petition was allowed, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 09 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366802