<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 536 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366800</link>
    <description>The tribunal decided in favor of the assessee against the revenue, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes regarding the allowance of advertisement expenses. The tribunal remanded the issue to the assessing officer for verification of the claim and the period of the advertisement expenses, emphasizing the need for a fair opportunity for the assessee. The tribunal did not provide a detailed analysis on the allowance of holding company expenses based on a Memorandum of Understanding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:12:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 536 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366800</link>
      <description>The tribunal decided in favor of the assessee against the revenue, allowing the appeal for statistical purposes regarding the allowance of advertisement expenses. The tribunal remanded the issue to the assessing officer for verification of the claim and the period of the advertisement expenses, emphasizing the need for a fair opportunity for the assessee. The tribunal did not provide a detailed analysis on the allowance of holding company expenses based on a Memorandum of Understanding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>