<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 530 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366794</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a cooperative bank, regarding interest on Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) for the assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14. The Tribunal held that interest on NPAs should be recognized on a receipt basis, not on an accrual basis, following RBI guidelines and judicial precedents. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the deduction for gratuity premium paid to the LIC Gratuity Fund, upholding that payments to LIC under a group gratuity scheme qualify for deduction. The appeals of the revenue were dismissed, and the cross objections of the assessee were dismissed as they were filed beyond the due date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2018 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 530 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366794</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a cooperative bank, regarding interest on Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) for the assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14. The Tribunal held that interest on NPAs should be recognized on a receipt basis, not on an accrual basis, following RBI guidelines and judicial precedents. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the deduction for gratuity premium paid to the LIC Gratuity Fund, upholding that payments to LIC under a group gratuity scheme qualify for deduction. The appeals of the revenue were dismissed, and the cross objections of the assessee were dismissed as they were filed beyond the due date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>