<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 529 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366793</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed both appeals filed by the assessee and the revenue. The assessee failed to substantiate the sources of capital introduced, sundry creditors, and loan creditors, leading to additions to the income. The CIT(A) and ITAT upheld the additions due to lack of evidence. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the tax effect was below the threshold set by a CBDT Circular, making it not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:11:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 529 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366793</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed both appeals filed by the assessee and the revenue. The assessee failed to substantiate the sources of capital introduced, sundry creditors, and loan creditors, leading to additions to the income. The CIT(A) and ITAT upheld the additions due to lack of evidence. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the tax effect was below the threshold set by a CBDT Circular, making it not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>