<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 526 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366790</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and deleting the disallowance of Rs. 56,95,726 under section 14A r.w. Rule 8D of IT Rules, 1962. The Tribunal held that since the assessee did not earn any exempt income during the relevant year, the disallowance of expenditure under section 14A was not justified, following a Delhi High Court precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:11:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 526 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366790</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and deleting the disallowance of Rs. 56,95,726 under section 14A r.w. Rule 8D of IT Rules, 1962. The Tribunal held that since the assessee did not earn any exempt income during the relevant year, the disallowance of expenditure under section 14A was not justified, following a Delhi High Court precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>