<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 518 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366782</link>
    <description>The court granted relief to the petitioner in a writ petition concerning the import of goods against specific Bills of Entry. The court directed the respondent to release the goods imported against one Bill of Entry, refund any excess amount collected for another Bill of Entry, and resolve the issue of declared value. The court proposed a resolution where the petitioner would pay duty according to the declared value, execute a bank guarantee for the disputed amount, and be allowed to file an appeal for the previous import. The court emphasized adherence to declared valuation for future imports and prompt issuance of appealable orders to prevent further disputes and delays in customs clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:11:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 518 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366782</link>
      <description>The court granted relief to the petitioner in a writ petition concerning the import of goods against specific Bills of Entry. The court directed the respondent to release the goods imported against one Bill of Entry, refund any excess amount collected for another Bill of Entry, and resolve the issue of declared value. The court proposed a resolution where the petitioner would pay duty according to the declared value, execute a bank guarantee for the disputed amount, and be allowed to file an appeal for the previous import. The court emphasized adherence to declared valuation for future imports and prompt issuance of appealable orders to prevent further disputes and delays in customs clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>