<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 517 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366781</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition by directing the release of imported goods without demurrage and detention charges. It instructed respondents 3 and 4 to comply with waiver certificates and take departmental action against them for their disobedience. Emphasizing the importance of following official orders, the court highlighted the need for regulatory action to be initiated against non-compliant parties to uphold departmental directives and avoid repeated court interventions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:11:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 517 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366781</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition by directing the release of imported goods without demurrage and detention charges. It instructed respondents 3 and 4 to comply with waiver certificates and take departmental action against them for their disobedience. Emphasizing the importance of following official orders, the court highlighted the need for regulatory action to be initiated against non-compliant parties to uphold departmental directives and avoid repeated court interventions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>