<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 516 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366780</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal imposing duty and penalty on the appellant for confiscated goods intended for export to Nepal. The Court affirmed the confiscation under Section 113(c) of the Customs Act, 1962, based on evidence indicating the goods&#039; movement towards the border. However, the Court ruled that penalties should be imposed on either the establishment or its owner, not both, to avoid double punishment. Consequently, the Court directed the Revenue authorities to recover the penalty from one party only, modifying the penalty imposition while upholding the confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:11:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=533824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 516 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366780</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal imposing duty and penalty on the appellant for confiscated goods intended for export to Nepal. The Court affirmed the confiscation under Section 113(c) of the Customs Act, 1962, based on evidence indicating the goods&#039; movement towards the border. However, the Court ruled that penalties should be imposed on either the establishment or its owner, not both, to avoid double punishment. Consequently, the Court directed the Revenue authorities to recover the penalty from one party only, modifying the penalty imposition while upholding the confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>