https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366769 The court confirmed the conviction of the revision petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for bouncing cheques due to insufficient funds. The petitioner's appeal was unsuccessful as the Second Additional District Judge upheld the lower court's decision. The petitioner's arguments challenging the debt discharge without proper evidence were dismissed. The defense's theory of lost cheques was not accepted, emphasizing the petitioner's lack of cooperation with the investigation. The court emphasized the importance of timely responses and substantial evidence, ultimately dismissing the revision petition and upholding the conviction and sentence. en-us Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:10:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366769 The court confirmed the conviction of the revision petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for bouncing cheques due to insufficient funds. The petitioner's appeal was unsuccessful as the Second Additional District Judge upheld the lower court's decision. The petitioner's arguments challenging the debt discharge without proper evidence were dismissed. The defense's theory of lost cheques was not accepted, emphasizing the petitioner's lack of cooperation with the investigation. The court emphasized the importance of timely responses and substantial evidence, ultimately dismissing the revision petition and upholding the conviction and sentence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366769