https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366756 The Tribunal held that the show cause notice dated 14.6.2016 demanding duty on goods was not sustainable in law, following legal precedent. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief. The case involved duty demand against M/s B.M. Enterprises, penalty on M/s Devika Enterprises, ownership disputes over brand names, and allegations of suppression of facts by the appellant. The analysis highlighted flaws in the investigation and subsequent notices, ultimately leading to the decision in favor of the appellants. en-us Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Sep 2018 08:09:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366756 The Tribunal held that the show cause notice dated 14.6.2016 demanding duty on goods was not sustainable in law, following legal precedent. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief. The case involved duty demand against M/s B.M. Enterprises, penalty on M/s Devika Enterprises, ownership disputes over brand names, and allegations of suppression of facts by the appellant. The analysis highlighted flaws in the investigation and subsequent notices, ultimately leading to the decision in favor of the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366756